A Tale of Two Pets

January 15, 2008 at 1:08 pm (1)

All hunters will tell you that one of the main appeals of the class is the pet-owner bond. Sure, this is a virtual world and my pet is just a bunch of 1’s and 0’s, but it’s uncanny how many hunters grow attached and refuse to part with a particular pet to tame a new one — even if the new one offers better skills or abilities.

My first pet on Ghostfire was a level 10 ravager named Scrunchie. Despite looking like a cockroach going through puberty, I loved Scrunchie. She was an animated blender at my command, and she stuck it out with me from level 10 to level 70. Sure, there are prettier ravager models in Outland, but Scrunchie is special to me; we have a bond. It’s unthinkable that I’d ever replace her, or that she wouldn’t continue the journey with me to 80 when the expansion pack hits.

That said, I never felt the need to tame a second pet in the game until I heard about the guys who figured out how to tame the summonable ghost wolves following patch 2.3. I’ve had a soft spot for wolves, but because Blizzard so clearly favors cats in this game, the wolf models sport only a limited selection of looks. The second I saw a screenshot of the ghost wolf, I knew I had to get one. I mapped out my strategy, I scrounged for a helmet, gold for a metagem, and coerced some buddies into helping. When we successfully tamed Oz — on our first try, no less — well, that instantly went into my top 5 moments of playing WoW, ever. Oz might not be the best pet, stat-wise, but I formed a second bond with this critter, enough to make me stick it out having to level him from 30 to (currently) 66.

As any hunter will tell you, the owner-pet bond is one of the things that keeps them playing their class.

It came as a sucker punch to the gut when I logged out last night and read that Blizzard was no longer allowing players to tame ghost wolves (the grimtotem spirit guides). Drysc posted this as their reasoning: “The unintended nature of the taming, the undead status of the guide, appearance of the wolf in relation to the feel of the hunter class, and the complex processes of taming were all issues touched upon and discussed. ”

At first I thought this meant that I’d be losing Oz, but I guess they’re allowing current ghost wolves to stay in the game (big sigh of relief). However, this is a completely bone-headed move on Blizzard’s behalf. Yes, I know it’s just a pet type that’s no longer tamable, and in the grand scheme of things, it doesn’t seem to matter — yet it does. Follow me now:

1. Blizzard lied. When ghost wolf taming was initially discovered, worried players asked Blizzard if this was something that would be changed, or if it was safe to start saving up for the mats to tame this guy. A Blue went on record to say: “While this feature of the Grimtotem Spirit Guide wasn’t exactly intended, it was agreed by the development team that this is a fun use of in-game mechanics, and we therefore have no plans to address this issue – it will still be possible in future for everyone who wishes to tame this NPC to do so. :)” Now, we can’t. Blizzard lied.

2. Blizzard stealth-hotfixed it. This is where the real protest stems from. Without announcing to the hunter population that the ghost wolf would become unavailable, Blizzard went ahead and quietly hotfixed it. Only when players who tried to tame the ghost wolf recently and failed discovered this as an issue and posted a question about it on the forums did Blizzard come out and admit the change. It’s one thing to lie, it’s another thing to stab your players in the back this way.

3. Taming a ghost wolf took considerable preparations: time, money and effort. When this hotfix was discovered, many hunters had already blown over a hundred gold or so on the metagem and were in various stages of preparation for the taming. Now, they’re left in the lurch.

4. The reasons that Blizzard cited are invalid. In particular, the reason that ghost wolves are “undead” and don’t fit in with the hunter class. This is silly — hunters can tame three pets that are definitely undead (like the plagued boar) and another pet with a transparent look (the ghost saber).

5. Ghost wolves have no special abilities over any other pet, other than a unique look. There’s absolutely no threat to balance in leaving them in the game.

6. This is in keeping with Blizzard’s policy of “If it’s a fun feature but we didn’t deliberately create it, it must go.” We’ve seen this time and again: a player discovers an inventive use of a spell or an item or a game feature, and has a lot of fun with it — then Blizzard comes away and yanks the fun toy away because they didn’t mean to do it on purpose. Sure, sometimes that toy causes imbalance, but when it doesn’t, it makes no sense that Blizzard should get prickly about it. Your game just got MORE FUN for its players. You have unintentionally SATISFIED a paying customer. What business model sees this as a bad thing? Instead of hotfixing it, Blizzard should be wholeheartedly embracing this quirk and turn it into a supported feature: rare-looking pets that take significant effort to tame, sort of like an epic hunter pet quest.

7. This sours hunters on other pets. Blizzard cites time and again the wide field of beasts already available to hunters for taming, however, in reality this boils down to a mere handful of choices. You want a tank pet? Get a boar. A dps pet? Get a cat, ravager or raptor. You want to annoy the crap out of your fellow dungeon runners? Get a bird. Other pets are statistically inferior or lack key trainable skills, such as dash, to make them appealing for hunters to tame. To paraphrase a poster on the hunter forums, what does it matter to Blizzard, that a player can tame a beast with skin model A, but can’t tame an identical creature who sports skin model B? Why does it matter to Blizzard so much that they actively limit the more unique and cool-looking beasts that we can tame? Darn it, I want to tame a giraffe!

8. Current ghost wolf owners are understandably worried. Suddenly, their pet of choice has been deemed “Bad” by Blizzard. Sure, we’re allowed to keep the pet, but the reversal of their support of ghost wolf taming, coupled with the stealth hotfix, has left us with little assurance that our ghost wolves are safe in the future. Blizzard has in the past, many times, yanked tamed pets away from their owners because they retroactively decide that a certain beast shouldn’t be tamable. It’s entirely possible that I might log in one day to see Oz’s looks changed to a normal wolf, or to be unable to feed Oz (and have him flee once his loyalty bottoms out).

I’m sure Blizzard doesn’t think much about this issue, but if, like me, this annoys you and points to a larger problem with the Blizzard mindset, then post your support on the hunter forums today.

EDITED TO ADD:

About these ads

13 Comments

  1. Big Bear Butt said,

    I wholeheartedly agree with everything you just said.

    Well done, indeed.

    It does, absolutely does, make me feel like not playing my hunter when Blizz does crap like this.

  2. boazar said,

    Wow. That’s extremely lame.

    Posted my support on the forums.

  3. Blogosphere doesn't like Ghostwolf Nerf either | Altitis said,

    […] Time Well Wasted (discovered through BBB) goes to the heart of the issue: “We’ve seen this time and again: a player discovers an inventive use of a spell or an item or a game feature, and has a lot of fun with it — then Blizzard comes away and yanks the fun toy away because they didn’t mean to do it on purpose. Sure, sometimes that toy causes imbalance, but when it doesn’t, it makes no sense that Blizzard should get prickly about it. Your game just got MORE FUN for its players. You have unintentionally SATISFIED a paying customer. What business model sees this as a bad thing? Instead of hotfixing it, Blizzard should be wholeheartedly embracing this quirk and turn it into a supported feature: rare-looking pets that take significant effort to tame, sort of like an epic hunter pet quest.“ […]

  4. One Among Many said,

    Nicely written. I was playing a lvl 60 hunter at the time of the serpent nerf. Fortunately by then I had already gotten screwed by blizzard and became a survival hunter with no pet (well, I had one…but rarely used it).

    Unfortunately, from everything I’ve witnessed as a hunter of three years…I’d be anything someday those wolves will be removed entirely…no more feeding…no more loyalty or happiness…just gone.

    It seems to be a theme for blizzard. This is nothing new to me, and is one of many reasons I don’t like the company. Their morals and ideals are their own and not shared by anyone. Rip a hunter’s pet away? What hunter would EVER say “sure go ahead, I dont mind”…not one.

  5. One Among Many said,

    be should be “bet”

  6. Ghost Wolf Gone - but is it all bad? « Chain Trap - Musings of a Survival Hunter said,

    […] Gone – but is it all bad? Posted by ChainTrap under mechanics, pet   As reported over on Time Well Wasted and Big Bear Butt Blogger, the ability to tame the Grimtotem Spirit Guide wolf has been removed, […]

  7. Mania’s Arcania » Ghost Wolf Removal Roundup said,

    […] at Time Well Wasted posted “A Tale of Two Pets“, also with links to more reactions. Maybe this list of mine isn’t so […]

  8. Breakfast Topic: Blizzard made me quit | Warcraft-News.com said,

    […] In fact, with that change, discontent is circling the blogosphere as well as the forums. John Patricelli of WoW Insider and Big Bear Butt Blogger, has quite a bit to say about the nerf, and Time Well Wasted composed a very thorough write-up on the subject. […]

  9. awender said,

    This is not the first time they lied. I think the money took their mind away. They think they can do anything.

    They lied to me as well. Then after two years they are simply ignoring the fact, that they promised something. I described it in my post: http://blizzardsucks.blogspot.com

    This is a story how Blizzard told me, that everything is okay with my account, then after two years they suspended my account.

    They lie. They are not caring anymore about the community.

    If there’s any other MMORPG on the horizon worth to play with, I’ll leave WoW ***immediately***

  10. Weekly Digest: Kael Still a Douche, Hunters Saddened, and Mattcast Going Through : World of Matticus said,

    […] been a large outcry over Blizzard’s reversal in their stance of the ghost wolf pet (formerly a bug). […]

  11. Bonz said,

    I’m somewhat happy with the change out of selfishness, I have an even more and unique pet than it was originally because it’s no longer attainable. It’s like the original epic mounts that were different in look and unarmoured. When you see someone with one, you sortof have to look at them in awe, because they have an item that doesn’t exist anymore and it gives them uniqueness.

    However, I do agree that Blizzards reasoning and the events leading up to it were uncalled for.

    Though if they decide to pull a snake pet-feeding bug, looks like I’m going to do a lot of BG-pet happiness rezzing. Even if it’s just to run around with this guy for looks.

  12. Tams said,

    WoW thats nutz, I wouldn’t have even have known about it, if i hadn’t read this….
    Sure is annoying to pay for something and then get punched in the balls like that … :(

  13. Tips for Keeping Pets by raicha100 - Pets world said,

    […] and magazines to acknowledge and fulfill their pet’s needs.If you liked this post then you may like this one […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: